Zygo etalons

Why We Invest in Metrology

Manufacturing precision optics is one thing. Maintaining consistency across production is another.

Our metrology investment isn't about generating paperwork—it's about manufacturing excellence. We use laboratory-grade instruments to verify our processes, catch issues before they become problems, and ensure that every telescope we ship meets or exceeds its published specifications.

When a new coating run arrives, we characterize it on the Zygo before it enters production. When we assemble an etalon, we verify spectral performance on the monochromator. When something doesn't look right through the eyepiece, we have the tools to diagnose exactly what's happening and why.

But here's what matters most: individual component specifications don't tell the whole story. A telescope system with multiple precision optical elements—etalon, blocking filter, objective lens, double-stack modules—has tolerance interactions that can't be predicted from bench testing alone.

That's why every Lunt telescope is tested on the Sun itself before it ships. We swap blocking filters, adjust configurations, and match components until the complete system delivers the chromospheric detail our customers expect. The Sun is the ultimate test target, and we use it.

Our published specifications are conservative by design. They account for real-world tolerance stacking across all components. The actual design targets are tighter—but we only promise what we can guarantee in a complete, matched system.

Learn More

SURFACE METROLOGY

Surface Figure Analysis: Zygo Verifire Laser Interferometer

Factory Certified by Zygo — November 2024 Recently upgraded to Verifire system with 1200×1200 detector

Surface figure—the precise shape of an optical surface—determines how light behaves when it encounters that surface. For Fabry-Perot etalons, surface errors translate directly into spectral performance degradation. A "flat" surface that isn't actually flat produces an etalon that isn't actually narrowband.

Our Zygo Verifire interferometer measures surface figure with sub-nanometer precision across the full aperture. The system uses phase-shifting interferometry at 632.8nm with a 1200×1200 pixel detector, providing over 1.4 million measurement points per surface.

What We Measure:

Peak-to-Valley (P-V): The total range from highest to lowest point on the surface. Our production etalon substrates typically measure λ/70 or better P-V.

RMS (Root Mean Square): A statistical measure of overall surface roughness that accounts for the entire measured area, not just the extremes. Our typical production surfaces achieve 0.002λ RMS, equivalent to 1.3 nanometers.

Power: The spherical curvature component. Unlike many manufacturers who remove power from their specifications to make numbers look better, we report power-included values. Our surfaces are genuinely flat—not mathematically corrected.

Typical Production Etalon Substrate — 45mm Diameter
Measurement Value
P-V 0.014λ (λ/71)
RMS 0.002λ (1.3nm)
Power -0.002λ (negligible)
Measured on Zygo Verifire, 632.8nm, QPSI mode, 1200×1200 resolution
Power included — this is the conservative measurement, not mathematically flattened.

Why RMS Matters More Than P-V

Peak-to-valley measurements can be misleading—a single dust particle or edge artifact can dominate the P-V value while the actual working surface is far better. RMS provides a statistically meaningful measure of the entire surface.

For etalon applications, RMS directly correlates with:

  • Spectral transmission efficiency
  • FWHM consistency across the aperture
  • Ghost image suppression
  • Overall filter contrast

Our sub-2nm RMS surfaces aren't achieved through luck or careful sample selection. They're the natural result of classical pitch polishing techniques that eliminate the mid-spatial-frequency errors inherent in CNC diamond polishing.

SPECTRAL METROLOGY

Spectral Performance Analysis: Sciencetech 9150 Monochromator

Recently upgraded with 1800 l/mm grating and high-sensitivity PMT detector Factory tested and calibrated by Sciencetech Inc. — October 2025

Surface quality is the foundation. Spectral performance is the proof.

Our Sciencetech 9150 monochromator—a 1.5-meter focal length research-grade instrument—provides laboratory-quality measurement of etalon spectral characteristics. This class of instrument is typically found in university research labs and national metrology institutes, not production facilities.

The recent upgrade to an 1800 lines/mm grating and high-sensitivity photomultiplier tube gives us 0.09 angstrom spectral resolution—fine enough to accurately characterize our narrowest hydrogen-alpha filters without instrument broadening affecting the measurement.

What We Measure:

Central Wavelength (CWL): The peak transmission wavelength of the etalon. For H-alpha filters, we verify alignment to the 656.28nm hydrogen-alpha emission line with ±0.02nm accuracy.

Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM): The bandwidth of the filter measured at 50% of peak transmission. This determines how much of the solar chromosphere you see versus the photospheric continuum. Our 0.09Å instrument resolution means we measure actual filter performance, not instrument limitations.

Transmission Profile: The complete spectral response curve reveals sideband suppression, blocking effectiveness, and overall filter quality in ways that single-number specifications cannot.

Sciencetech 9150 Monochromator System

Parameter Specification
Model Sciencetech 9150
Focal Length 1.5 meters
Grating 1800 lines/mm, blazed @ 500nm
Spectral Resolution 0.009nm (0.09Å) FWHM @ 632.8nm
Wavelength Accuracy ±0.02nm (measured: 0.007nm avg)
Repeatability ±0.017nm
Calibrated Range 253–761nm
Minimum Step Size 0.002nm (2 picometers)
Detector Photomultiplier Tube (Hamamatsu R928)

All specifications verified by Sciencetech Inc. factory testing, October 2025

Why Monochromator Focal Length and Grating Density Matter

Spectral resolution in a grating monochromator depends on focal length and grating line density. Our 1.5-meter focal length combined with an 1800 lines/mm grating achieves 0.009nm resolution—roughly 15× better than typical 0.25-meter bench spectrometers.

This matters because:

  • Accurate FWHM measurement: A 0.5Å filter measured on a 0.15Å-resolution spectrometer would read as ~0.52Å due to convolution. Our 0.09Å resolution adds negligible broadening.
  • True CWL verification: ±0.02nm wavelength accuracy means we can verify H-alpha alignment to better than 0.2Å—critical for filters designed to sit precisely on the 656.28nm emission line.
  • Sideband detection: Higher resolution reveals spectral features that coarser instruments blur together, allowing us to verify blocking performance and detect manufacturing issues.

The difference between "good enough" QC and laboratory-grade metrology is the difference between hoping your filter performs and knowing it does.

Why We Don't Use Spectral Lamps for FWHM Measurement

Some manufacturers measure etalon bandwidth using a hydrogen spectral lamp. This method is fundamentally flawed: a hydrogen discharge lamp produces a line only ~0.1Å wide. You cannot measure a 0.5Å filter with a 0.1Å source—the lamp runs out of photons before you reach the filter's half-maximum points. It's like measuring a doorway with a laser pointer.

We illuminate our etalons with a broadband continuum source and scan with the monochromator. The etalon is the narrowest element in the optical path, so we measure the etalon—not our source. This is the only valid method for true FWHM verification.

Why Our Etalons Stay True to Specification

Here's something our competitors won't tell you: how they tune their etalons to reach the hydrogen-alpha wavelength matters as much as the surface quality they start with.

Most manufacturers use mechanical pressure—physically pressing on the etalon plates—to adjust the gap spacing and shift the transmission peak to 656.28nm. This approach has a fundamental problem: you've just spent considerable effort achieving λ/60 or better surface flatness, and then you apply mechanical force that deforms those surfaces under load.

A mechanically stressed etalon may hit the target wavelength, but the surface figure is compromised. The result? Degraded FWHM, reduced contrast, and performance that doesn't match the published specification. When a competitor claims "<0.5Å FWHM" while using mechanical tuning, ask yourself: is that the design spec, or the actual performance under load?

Lunt uses barometric pressure chambers for wavelength tuning.

Our etalons are sealed in a controlled atmosphere. To shift the transmission wavelength, we adjust the air pressure inside the chamber. This changes only the refractive index of the air in the gap—the optical path length shifts without any mechanical stress on the plates.

The surfaces remain exactly as flat as they were when they came off our polishing table. No deformation. No compromise. The λ/67 surface figure we measured on the Zygo is the surface figure you get in your telescope.

Approach Effect on Gap Effect on Surfaces
Mechanical pressing Physical deformation Surfaces stressed, figure degrades
Pressure chamber Refractive index change Zero mechanical stress, figure preserved

Mechanical Tuning vs. Pressure Tuning

When the surface figure is the foundation of spectral performance, how you tune the etalon determines whether that foundation survives.

We Show Our Work. Ask Your Supplier About Theirs.

We publish our metrology capabilities and manufacturing methods because we're confident in how we build our products. The Zygo data we've shown represents typical production quality—not a cherry-picked sample. The pressure-tuning approach we've described is how every Lunt etalon reaches its target wavelength.

Questions worth asking any solar telescope manufacturer:

What surface figure do your etalon substrates achieve? Can you show representative data?
How do you tune your etalons to the H-alpha wavelength—pressure chamber or mechanical force?
Are your published FWHM specifications measured on the complete system, or just the etalon in isolation?
Do you test complete telescope assemblies on the Sun before shipping?
How do you account for tolerance stacking when multiple precision components work together?

We're not the only company making quality solar telescopes. But we may be the only one willing to explain exactly how we do it.

Questions About Our Process?

If you want to understand more about how Lunt telescopes are manufactured and tested, we're happy to discuss our methods. Our commitment to transparency extends beyond this page.

Complete System Qualification

Individual component specifications tell you what each part can do in isolation. They don't tell you how those parts perform together in your telescope.

A telescope with a high-quality etalon, matched blocking filter, precision objective, and optional double-stack module has complex interactions. Tolerance stacking means the sum of "in-spec" components doesn't automatically equal an "in-spec" system. The only way to know for certain is to test the complete assembly.

Our qualification process:

Substrate and Component Verification

Raw substrates are measured on the Zygo. Etalons are characterized by the monochromator. New coating runs are verified before entering production. This catches issues early.

Component Matching

We don't just grab parts from inventory and box them together. Blocking filters are matched to etalon assemblies. Double-stack modules are paired with their base systems. We swap components until the combination delivers optimal performance.

Sun Testing

Every telescope assembly is tested on the Sun before it ships. Not a light table. Not a simulator. The actual Sun—the target your telescope was designed to observe. We evaluate chromospheric detail, prominence visibility, contrast, and overall optical quality with the complete system configured exactly as you'll receive it.

The Result: When your Lunt telescope arrives, it's already been proven on the Sun by the people who built it. The components work together. The performance is real.

Metrology-Grade Optical Flats

The same surface quality standards we apply to etalon substrates are available in our precision optical flat product line.

Our classical pitch polishing techniques achieve surface figures that CNC automation cannot match. While CNC-polished flats typically show 5-10nm RMS from mid-spatial-frequency tool path errors, our pitch-polished surfaces achieve 1.3-1.9nm RMS—the smooth, gradual topology visible in our published Zygo data.

Applications:

Interferometer calibration and reference standards
Precision manufacturing QC
Research and metrology laboratories
Coating facility substrates

Each optical flat is verified on our Zygo Verifire before shipping.